In case you missed part one, here it is: Daniel Kovarbasich: Not Gay, He was a Victim Who Couldn’t Take it Anymore. Part One In a Series
True TV has reported that the prosecutors in Daniel’s case say Daniel ‘prostituted himself by taking advantage of Duane Hurley’s generosity.’ How stupid can a highly educated well-paid prosecutor be? A young teenage boy is in no emotional or psychological position to be given gifts and favors by a fifty five year-old man. His brain is not able to know how to handle it. Duane Hurley was the adult and fully capable of understanding the consequences when he began (allegedly) grooming a young teen into eventually having an on-going sexual relationship with him.
One of Duane Hurley’s neighbors, shown as a woman named “Denise,” was interviewed about the case. Denise said she ‘doesn’t buy it’ that in all those years no one else came forward about sexual abuse and she said Duane was ‘not that kind of person.’ Oh? and what “kind of person” sexually abuses children and teens? A man in a trench coat who stands on the street corner in front of a school? Or maybe she thinks it’s only uneducated men who live in trailer parks who rape and molest kids?. I wonder, why exactly Denise thinks her nice neighbor had over 1,500 images of gay porn, including men having sex with boys, on his computer? It was reported that the images were only accessible with the password that Duane Hurley used for his personal email and E bay accounts. It was reported that some of the children were prepubescent and the children looked in pain. Wake up Denise! Nice looking, nicely dressed, financially well-off neighbors often have a side to them that they do not show YOU when they wave to you from their driveway or when they see you at a barbeque. Reality check: Child sexual abusers don’t go around announcing to the neighborhood that they get turned on by teenage boys and that they are having sex with them!
Hurley’s neighbor’s aren’t the only people who don’t seem to have two degrees of common sense. A viewer called into True TV and asked the commentator how the allegations of sexual abuse could be true if there were no sex toys or lubricants found in Hurley’s bedroom. Are you kidding???? So what if no sex toys or lubricants were found! If a guy is getting the real thing then maybe he doesn’t need sex toys! Not everyone who has sex uses sex toys too, and or, lubricant. Excuse me for being graphic, but maybe Hurley used his own damn saliva as a lubricant.
I am also perplexed over why some reporters and courtroom “experts” ask the most stupid questions during interviews about the case. Normally I like Beth Karas of True TV, but in an interview with Daniel’s brother, she asked him with the tone of an old school marm, ‘Don’t you think that if there was sexual abuse going on, that Daniel would have told someone?’ Hello???? Where have you been Ms. Karas? After all the sex crimes cases you have reported about, you should know by now that 95% of victims don’t tell anyone, especially not teenage boys who are being sodomized by older men. The shame and embarrassment alone will shut a kid up.
One female viewer called True TV saying that ‘teens need stronger penalties so they won’t do these kind of things.’ No lady, how about if child sexual abusers receive stiffer sentences so the message to them is DON”T SEXUALLY ASSAULT CHILDREN! This lady wanted to punish the victim and blame the child, not address the root problem, which is the fucking perpetrators. Another thing barely mentioned in passing was that Daniel said he had been sexually molested or raped by a male adult when he was about seven years-old. This alone can cause years of repressed rage inside a victim and when another perpetrator triggers that rage, a victim can –and often will– take that previously repressed rage out on a current perpetrator.
Prosecutors keep saying that Hurley ‘didn’t know it was coming.’ Newsflash for all would-be child rapists: If you are going to rape a teenage boy, and then repeatedly have sex with him, you had better be prepared for your victim to one day retaliate with all the rage that was built up with each sex act throughout the years.
Daniel didn’t claim that Hurley tried to rape him and that he had to kill him in self-defense. He said that he killed Hurley because the man had been sexually abusing him for a very long time and that the last time he wanted it, Daniel had enough. This alone is credible evidence of child sexual abuse. If Daniel were making this up, he would have said Hurley unexpectedly tried to rape him that morning and he fought back. My guess is that just, before the killing, Daniel had been forced one more time into (allegedly) having sex with Hurley but decided that this would be the last time because his rage was overwhelming. In my opinion, Daniel Kovarbasich told the truth and he is being punished for it with the ignorance of those who don’t want to believe, who don’t educate themselves about abuse, and those who prefer to think that children being sexually assaulted will always tell someone.
Daniel says that he did try to stop the relationship, but he was too full of shame and fear so he kept giving in to the sex with Hurley. Daniel probably felt in his mind that he was partially guilty because he had taken the gifts, favors and money. Daniel didn’t do anything or say anything earlier because he felt shame over (allegedly) having sex with a man and for taking material rewards for it. Daniel has openly stated that he was NOT gay and only has heterosexual desires. In my opinion, on the morning that Daniel snapped into violence, he was through with lying to himself by engaging in sex with a man.
To read Part Three: Click Here
Source: True TV, Ohio V. Daniel Kovarbasich