Does the New York Times Blame an Eleven Year-Old Girl For Being Gang-Raped?

Alternet:

“There is an awful story in the New York Times today: Vicious Assault Shakes Texas Town. It’s about the arrest of 18 boys and men, ranging in age “from middle schoolers to a 27-year-old,” for the gang-rape of an 11-year-old girl.

As horrible as this story is, the article serves as a great example of exactly what we mean by “rape culture.”

1) By paragraph #4, we have been told the ages of the men and several have been personalized: “Five suspects are students at Cleveland High School, including two members of the basketball team. Another is the 21-year-old son of a school board member.” Etc. All we know about the 11-year-old is her age and gender.”

My comments: Or the Times could be making the point that basketball stars, and children of school board members, are capable of raping little girls. All we need to know about the victim is that she was raped, and her age and gender. She might not want any identifying information given out.

“2) In paragraph #4, we read the following question: “[I]f the allegations are proved, how could [the community’s] young men have been drawn into such an act?”. Which suggests, of course, that it really isn’t their fault they raped a child; they were just “drawn into it.” Indeed, according to one of the people quoted, “These boys have to live with this the rest of their lives.”

I agree here. The men and boys being “drawn in” sounds like the victim enticed them, or that each individual is less culpable because there were so many others raping the child.

“3) The actual word “rape” is avoided whenever possible. The reader is told that the girl had been forced to have sex, she was “sexually assaulted,” and she was threatened with violence if she “did not comply.”

Wow. Here, the Times clearly does make it seem as though the victim complied to “sex.”

“4) Now ask yourself the reason for the following paragraph to have been included:

Residents in the neighborhood where the abandoned trailer stands — known as the Quarters — said the victim had been visiting various friends there for months. They said she dressed older than her age, wearing makeup and fashions more appropriate to a woman in her 20s. She would hang out with teenage boys at a playground, some said.”

Nowhere in this story is the following made clear:

— That an 11-year-old child cannot consent to sex. Even if she had not been “told she would be beaten if she did not comply,” this would have been rape.

— That the victim also has to “live with this for the rest of her life.” The boys chose to do the things they will have to live with. She did not.

— That the men involved were not “drawn into this,” but made the conscious choice to rape a child.

— That our compassion and care should be directed first and foremost toward the victim rather than the boys, the school, the community, or anyone else.

— That just as we should not stand in judgment of the victim we should not venture to judge her mother. (“‘Where was her mother? What was her mother thinking?’ said Ms. Harrison, one of a handful of neighbors who would speak on the record.”) For all we know, the woman had been frantically trying to get someone, anyone, to listen to her concerns about her daughter. Even if she hadn’t been, parental neglect does not give other people a license to rape unsupervised children.

My impression when I finished reading the article was that the reader was being admonished to feel compassion and pain for the town and the boys. The victim had disappeared from article just as she had fled the town.

As so it goes—today in rape culture.”

The author of the Alternet piece missed this one:

“It’s just destroyed our community,” said Sheila Harrison, 48, a hospital worker who says she knows several of the defendants..”

Oh, so the community is destroyed! Not the child’s life, but the community! It sounds like this woman would have preferred the victim keep her mouth shut instead of telling anyone. If she kept quiet, and had not mentioned the nasty little word “rape,” then the community would not have to deal with such ugly things; they could all just continue on in their comfortable little lives.

The community hasn’t been “destroyed.” There wasn’t any tornado, flood, or hurricane. The community has been liberated Sheila Harrison! Liberated from its slumber of denial –denial that nice, athletic boys in the neighborhood are capable of violent rape. The child is the one who has been destroyed.

Alternet has a link to a petition to the New York Times: here

______________________________________________________________________________________________

www.alternet.org

Alternet

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Child Abuse, child molestation, child sexual abuse, Crime, Denial, evil, Headlines, News, rape and abuse and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

4 Responses to Does the New York Times Blame an Eleven Year-Old Girl For Being Gang-Raped?

  1. Hi. I wrote another post on my blog Spiritual Journey Of A Lightworker and put a link back to this article in my post. Here is the link to my post:
    http://patriciasingleton.blogspot.com/2011/03/post-about-11-year-old-gang-rape.html . Let me know what you think bout my post.

  2. The little girl didn’t flee the town. Another article that I read said that she was taken from her parents and put into foster care and place in another school district “for her protection.” I just wrote my own article on this subject at posted it at: http://patriciasingleton.blogspot.com/2011/03/roxane-gay-on-rumpusnet-writes-careless.html

    My post is about Roxane Gay’s post about the James C. McKinley, Jr. New York Times article. The title of Ms Gay’s post is “The Careless Language of Sexual Violence.” I have a second post about Mr. McKinley’s post coming out on March 15. I intend to write a 3rd post and link it back to your article and several others that I have read about this topic.

    It is horrible how much society wants to blame the victim instead of the rapists. I have been so angry the past few days since reading the part of Ms Gay’s post that told about the New York Times post. I just read your post tonight and we agree so much about the topic.

  3. Stacy says:

    Quanell X is a scary scary man….

  4. Stacy says:

    “My impression when I finished reading the article was that the reader was being admonished to feel compassion and pain for the town and the boys. The victim had disappeared from article just as she had fled the town.”

    Your’s and mine both!

    and Quanell X seems to be exonerating the rapist based on the color of skin. This wasn’t a black man tied to a pickup, dragged to death down the road… it’s the RAPE of a CHILD. That should trump every other card played.

Comments are closed.