Sandusky Tries To Get Court To Force Visitation With His Grandchildren

Visitation rights? No way man.

“BOB COSTAS: Are you a pedophile?
JERRY SANDUSKY: No.
BOB COSTAS: Are you sexually attracted to young boys, to underage boys?
JERRY SANDUSKY: Am I sexually attracted to underage boys?

Anyone who repeats the question is either thinking of the right thing to say, or subconsciously verifying the question as truth. Who has to think about the right answer to that question, other than someone who would say yes?

BOB COSTAS: Yes.
JERRY SANDUSKY: Sexually attracted, you know, I enjoy young people. I love to be around them.

Here again, he repeats the words “sexually attracted,” even adding “you know.”

But no I’m not sexually attracted to young boys.

“Jerry Sandusky is still making headlines nearly three months after charges were filed against him for over 50 counts of allegedly sexually abusing children. As a condition of his house arrest while he awaits trial, Sandusky cannot have any contact with children, period.

This is understandable. His actions Friday, however, were not.

Sandusky petitioned a judge to alter his agreement so that he may see his 11 grandchildren under the supervision of their parents.

Considering the fact that investigations are currently underway regarding sexual abuse allegations from a member of his own family, who is under the age of 18 and likely one of his grandchildren, Sandusky’s request is ludicrous and should be promptly rejected.

In an ideal world, the public opinion regarding any defendant in a criminal case is innocent until proven guilty. Sandusky’s case, however, provides a rare exception to this rule.

At this point, we can presume guilt beyond a reasonable doubt, at least to the extent that we can justify preventing him access to children in his home while he awaits trial. Consider the evidence against him: more than 50 counts of sex crimes against children spanning decades, with victims and witnesses recounting eerily similar situations.

Now, he wants to see his grandkids, whom he may have assaulted, and he is also asking that friends be allowed to visit.

He hasn’t been convicted yet, so we cannot legally deny him certain rights, but the possibility of him spending a second with a child has horrific implications.”

____________________________________________________

dailygame

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Child Abuse, child molestation, child sexual abuse, Crime, rape and abuse and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Sandusky Tries To Get Court To Force Visitation With His Grandchildren

  1. mary says:

    Little Nel, you know who Jerry Sandusky reminds me of… Michael Jackson. I see alot of parallels between them.

    • little nel says:

      Yes, they are both like the pied piper. They are larger than life and know how to entice and attract children.

      • Alethea says:

        I don’t know Little Nel. I see MJ as enticing and attractive to children. I have to wonder if Sandusky used power and threats, and the fact that his victims were from a different ethnic group/race than he is.

    • Alethea says:

      Hi Mary. I don’t know. I see more differences that similarities between the two. MJ seemed more secretive and seductive. I think Sandusky is more violent, aggressive and out there with his actions.

  2. Lucifer says:

    Sandusky operates with impunity because all the coaches do it, they are rich and powerful and know for the most part they can get away with it. And if they dont do it, they know it goes on and say nothing.

  3. little nel says:

    I think that Jerry Sandusky is in denial about his behavior.

  4. mary says:

    I don’t know why it takes 5o counts to prove that this guy should not be around children. When someone is accused of child molesting once, even if later they are eventually found to be innocent, for the time they are not proven innocent I would still not allow them to be near children because the potential harm that might occur to them outweighs the harm to the accused reputation…. as damaging as false claims can be, i think above all it’s important to protect children before adults. I know they are not 1oo% accurate, but why dont they utilize lie detector tests for both parties as evidence in these cases? Heck, they could give the tests out multiple times to increase the accuracy of the results…. child molestation is a very difficult crime to prove otherwise.

Comments are closed.