Time Magazine: Legalized Child Porn

WARNING. THE IMAGE BELOW MAY TRIGGER A PERSON WHO HAS BEEN SEXUALLY ABUSED AS A CHILD. ………..

———-

———

——–

——-

——

—–

—-


It has taken me two days to be able to write about this.

When I first saw the image, I thought to myself, “Oh my God, I am looking at child pornography.” It literally made me sick inside. It was one of the most filthy and depraved images I have ever seen.

I have never in my life seen child pornography, but now I have.

There are some people in this society of ours, who are going to tell me I am “closed-minded” or there is something wrong with me for thinking bad things about the photo.

Anyone who holds to principles, knows this image is meant for one thing…..to corrupt the minds of children and adults….to desensitize them to adult-child sex, and to degrade motherhood and the parent-child relationship.

The mother in this photo was breastfed until she was age six. Her son, at the time of this photo, was almost four years-old. Children of these ages are very likely to be sexually stimulated by this act with their mother…and vice-versa!

I would not be surprised if this mother is turned on by it. Shocked that I say that? Well welcome to the real world. There are women out there who are perverted enough to use their child to be sexually aroused by them.

“The headline reads, “Are You Mom enough?” But if that wasn’t enough to fan the flames of the Mommy Wars, there’s the photo that goes with it: A pretty young woman wearing skinny jeans and a tank top, nursing her nearly 4-year-old son. It’s meant to illustrate a story about Dr. William Sears and attachment parenting but, given that there’s more to that movement than extended breastfeeding, it seems as if Time magazine was going for sensationalism and shock value.”

Time Magazine, in my opinion, is run by the same people who hope to normalize adult-child sex.

“That is not the look of a loving and caring Mother, but the look of a defiant woman, daring you to tell her to cover up and/or wean her child,”

Using a  good-looking young mother in a sexy tank top is a deliberate subliminal message to invite people into trying, or being interested in child sexual abuse.

“The mom on the provocative May 21st cover is 26-year-old Jamie Lynne Grumet of Los Angeles, a lactation consultant, breastfeeding advocate, and mother of two who blogs at I Am Not the Babysitter. The child at her breast is her son, Aram, who turns 4 in June. “I don’t consider breast feeding immodest at all,” she told Time magazine. “I’m not shy about doing it in public.”

Women like this are so fucking stupid, egotistical, and selfish. Screw everyone else right? What she wants to do in public is all that matters. Who cares about people who have been sexually abused as kids and don’t want to see a woman’s breast hanging out of her shirt in the lobby of a Mexican restaurant, with her five-year old sucking on her nipple.

What does she think, that men aren’t going to look at her breast hanging out and not get turned on by it? She probably loves being the center of attention.  Male sexual energies are powerful and men are visually stimulated. This mother loves what she does, and she probably enjoys turning men on.

I certainly don’t want to see a woman’s breast hanging out at me, “hello, look at me.” And I certainly don’t want to see a child, ESPECIALLY NOT A FOUR, FIVE, OR SIX YEAR-OLD, sucking on his mother’s tit in public. Nor do I want to see it in a photo while standing in line in the grocery store.

What has happened to humility and grace? What ever happened to class and sophistication? Why are today’s humans so vulgar and elemental in nature? Humans are devolving, not evolving.

“There are people who tell me there’s going to call social services on me or that it’s child molestation,” Grumet tells Time, adding that her mother breast-fed her until she was 6. “But people have to realize this is biologically normal. It’s not socially normal. The more people see it, the more it’ll become normal in our culture. That’s what I’m hoping. I want people to see it.”

This woman enjoys exposing herself and shocking people. She ought to do some psychoanalysis to find out why she does it.

“Photographer Martin Schoeller says that the photo, as well as the portraits he shot of other attachment parenting moms nursing their kids, was inspired by the iconic religious image of the Madonna and Child. “

What an iniquity. The Blessed Mother holding Jesus was depicted with Jesus being an infant, and The Holy Virgin has more grace and class in one millionth of her little pinky toe than these women WILL EVER have in their lifetime.

Time magazine further shows its agenda by calling the article, Are You Mom Enough?

“Are you mom enough?” challenges even humble and tactful mothers to be like all the other degenerates out there who want to normalize sexually stimulating activities between adults and children. It sends the message that any mother who doesn’t do it is hurting her child, or not up to standards of motherhood –that she is not “hip” or up with the times.

If I were a multimillionaire, I would sue Time Magazine for running offensive child porn that disturbs people who have been sexually abused as kids. I know I would not win, but it would be worth every dime to make myself heard and to send a message to the child porn peddlers out there who hide behind the facade of a “respectable” magazine.

______________________________________________________________

shine.yahoo.com

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Child Abuse, child molestation, child sexual abuse, Headlines, News and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

18 Responses to Time Magazine: Legalized Child Porn

  1. Nikki says:

    I normally agree with you, but this time I strongly disagree and am a little disappointed in your judgement. Breast feeding isn’t child abuse, it isn’t molestation. Period. Breast feeding is the way God intended mothers to feed their babies. I don’t necessarily agree with a four year old breast feeding, but it’s ultimately the mothers choice. If if she were forcing her son to breastfeed for publicity reasons, or because she’s just an oddball, it would constitute abuse, but not sexual abuse unless she were doing it for sexual purposes. I’ve seen/known children who breast feed beyond the time most kids are done with it, and in most cases it’s a mutual thing – it works for both mother and child – or the child is having difficulty/refuses to stop. I’ve never heard of a mother forcing a child to breastfeed, if you have proof that this is a growing concern please provide the evidence. The idea you put forth that women get turned on by breast feeding is really just crude and degrading; as a women I am very offended. I’m also very disappointed about your remarks regarding men getting turned on by breast feeding. If a man is turned on by it, then that is his prerogative, he’s the one with a problem. If women were held responsible for every time a guy got turned on, what kind of world would we live in? We’d live in a world in which rape wouldn’t be a crime if someone was wearing a short skirt or a shirt showing cleavage. How misogynist and repulsive. I’d also appreciate proof regarding your claims that Time magazine endorses child abuse.

    Sincerely,
    Disappointed Loyal Reader

    • Alethea says:

      Dear Nikki,

      It isn’t my judgement that you are disappointed with; it is the truth that you don’t like. My personal judgement has nothing to do with facts.

      I never said breast feeding was child abuse and molestation, but it can be when the child gets to a certain age. This boy was four years-old, and his mother’s mother nursed her until she was six years-old. There is something very strange about that family.

      “I’ve never heard of a mother forcing a child to breastfeed, if you have proof that this is a growing concern please provide the evidence.”

      I don’t need to provide “evidence.” I know of two women, one whose child was kicking and pushing the mother away because he was too old for it, and she refused to see his kicking and pushing as his wanting her to stop. She continued to do it because SHE wanted to. She was forcing him. I know of another woman who said she ‘doesn’t need to have sex with her husband because she gets stimulated with her older child nursing her.’ These are only two cases I know of personally, so I don’t need “evidence” to use my God-given intelligence to know that there are women out there who are forcing the child, and who are getting off on breastfeeding. Nor do I need to have “evidence” that an older child could easily begin to be sexually stimulated by sucking on the breast of his or her own mother. It is highly physiologically possible.

      “The idea you put forth that women get turned on by breast feeding is really just crude and degrading”

      As I said, some women DO, when the child is older, and if you are honest with yourself, some women probably do even when the child is an infant. It is physiological Nikki. Don’t be so shocked and offended by the way the human body is wired. How a mother reacts to that stimulation is the issue. If she disconnects from those feelings, then fine, but if she uses her child for sexual gratification then she is not okay.

      “as a women I am very offended.”

      I am offended as a conscious human being by having to see a woman’s tit hanging out of her shirt in a restaurant waiting area.

      “I’m also very disappointed about your remarks regarding men getting turned on by breast feeding. If a man is turned on by it, then that is his prerogative, he’s the one with a problem.”

      It’s not a “problem” for man to be turned on my seeing something sucking on a woman’s exposed breast, it is normal for a man to be stimulated that way. If a woman can’t be humble, graceful, and discreet enough to pump, or go into a bathroom stall, then she should stay home.

      “I’d also appreciate proof regarding your claims that Time magazine endorses child abuse.”

      I don’t need to provide “proof” of my opinion. My opinion is that Time Magazine meant to make that photo sexually provocative and did so using a child. That, to me, is child pornography.

      “Disappointed Loyal Reader”

      I will never please everyone all of the time –especially when I speak the truth in a world where the ego/self are the driven component in the mind and actions of humans.

  2. SurvivorSunshine says:

    Sick, sick, sick! The first thing that comes to mind is the woman on the cover was sexually abused but is trying to “normalize” abusing her own son under the guise of a lactation specialist and attachment parenting. Let’s check in on that kid in a few years and see how she screwed him up. I had an ex that breastfed until 5 or 6 and he had deep-seated issues with his mom and women in general. I suspect they had an incestuous relationship because he slept in her bed until his teens. It’s amazing how many women do this to their sons but proclaim they are such amazing mothers.

    • Alethea says:

      Good comment Sunshine. If this woman is getting off sexually on breast feeding her four year-old (she will probably do it until he is much older) then she is sexually abusing him. If he fights her at all, and she forces it on him anyway, she is sexually abusing him. If her son is being sexually stimulated (highly likely) while “beast feeding” then she IS SEXUALLY ABUSING HIM.

  3. little nel says:

    Women don’t pose seductively for a magazine cover like this when they breast feed their little men and then claim to be a lactation consultant to give them credibility.

    This photo is erotic and designed to titillate.

  4. Alethea says:

    “From what I can tell, people’s reactions appear to fall into some groups….

    – the “eww, it’s child porn, disgusting.”

    Child pornography….the visual representation or actual photos of children engaging in sexual activity or in lewd or erotic behavior designed to arouse the viewer’s sexual interest.

    Child pornography may include the exhibition of genitals in a sexually arousing fashion. As Little Nel pointed out, the boy and his mother are dressed and posed with both looking at the camera. The child is standing on a chair, in big boots, camo pants, and a rugged wear shirt. Quoting Little Nel, “This kid reeks testosterone and combat readiness.” The mother is wearing tight pants and a tank top with no bra and posed like a professional with a sultry look on her face.

    “gee, people, calm down; this is ‘tasteful’ compared to the junk on tv and online, but it’s still bad”

    There is nothing worse than hearing “calm down” from nincompoops who go about their lives dismissing everything in the world that is harmful, degenerate, abusive, subliminally destructive, or mind controlling. These kind of people wave their hand away at all of the injustices in the world and care more about making a buck, watching their favorite TV show, getting to their kid’s soccer game, going shopping, or hitting the local restaurant for “Happy Hour.”

    “there’s nothing wrong with the cover; people breastfeed, it’s just a breast, a picture, one person’s way of doing something, get over it.”

    Ah yes, another favorite…”Get over it” The classic three words told to so many victims and survivors of child sexual abuse. ‘oh so, you were sexually molested. There are a lot worse things that can happen to you.’ ‘oh so what, you don’t like to see a woman’s breast hanging out of her shirt? Get over it.’

    This isn’t the jungles of Africa. This is supposed to be a civilized nation. And what if it were a penis hanging out of a man’s pants? Would people still say, “get over it?”

  5. BAB says:

    You go, girl. I’m firing off a mail to the magazine tonight.

  6. little nel says:

    What is so vulgar to me is the way the boy and “mother” are dressed and posed with both looking at the camera.

    Big boots, camo pants, and rugged wear shirt. This kid reeks testosterone and combat readiness.

    Mom is wearing sexy tight pants and a tank top with no bra and posed like a professional with a sultry look on her face, who is looking for a “John.”

    The new face of porn?

    This is the same mentality as Pamela Anderson when she did the photos of her baby with Tommy Lee. Child porn with a twist. All I could think of was, that poor kid. How could a parent do something like that with their baby? Then make it public and act like it’s “normal.” This is filth.

    • Alethea says:

      I can’t recall that photo of Pam and Tommy Lee. What was the depiction?

      • little nel says:

        She was posing semi-nude (and most likely nude in the full spread) with her nude baby and she was sucking on a pacifier while posing seductively, and with other props that would be in a baby’s nursery. Tommy Lee was all over her, like he was sexually stimulated, with the baby in his arms.

        I only saw a couple of the photos. It made me angry that they would do with their baby.

  7. little nel says:

    Some women will do anything to get on the cover of a major magazine.

    A lactation consultant? She is most likely an out of work actress.

    • KC says:

      Just so you know; 99.999% of the women within 20 miles of Hollyweird are “out of work actressses. Anyhooooo, I think this “mom” just screams FLOOZIE & loves gaining attention of any living thing by any means she can use. She is NOT breastfeeding TittyBoy Jr. for all the reasons that are wholesome & pure as some women do in countries that warrant them breastfeeding beyond 3 yrs old (as for some of those kids in 3rd world, poor locales; that may be the only nutrutious thing they get to eat that day), if she was honest, blatantly so, she’d admit that she did this & this horseshite “attachment parenting” because it’s all about “ME ME ME, LOOK AT MEEEEEEEEE!!!” What’s going to happen when Titty Boy Jr. decides he would rather go sleep at a friend’s house or *gasp* wants the keys to the car? Is Mommy just gonna’ whip out her titty & use it like the bell in the Pavlov dog experiment? Attachment parenting scares the crap out of me as it seems it not beneficial for the children, but the clingy, psycho Mamas. Hope Titty Boy Jr. enjoys the endless ribbing & teasing he will endure once he actually leaves the house (my guess I “mommy” will keep him & his brother, Titty Boy Sr., at home & proclaim that she absolutely HAS to homeschool them because they are so “advanced.”) Ugh…

      • Alethea says:

        “ME ME ME, LOOK AT MEEEEEEEEE!!!”

        Exactly.

      • little nel says:

        “ME ME ME, Look at MEEEEEEEEE!!!”

        Of course, her son will be embarrassed when he looks back at this photo as he gets older.

        She will soon be getting job offers because she is so “hot.”

    • Alethea says:

      She is an egomaniac.

  8. jim says:

    thaat is just plain disturbing how can anyone allow such a thing to be released who in their right mind green lighted this? A pedofile? No wonder people get offended

Comments are closed.