Decades of Horror Perpetrated on Innocent Boys Could Have Been Prevented

“The world will not be destroyed by those who do evil, but by those who watch them without doing anything.” ~ Albert Einstein.

A serial child sex predator is finally behind bars, and for the rest of his life.

One of the victims testified he had to throw away bloody underwear on many occasions after being raped by Sandusky.

Several men, including Mike McQueary, his father, Joe Paterno, and several other Penn State officials as well as Penn State police….denied child sexual abuse was happening, ignored it, covered it up, minimized it and protected this child sex predator.  Oh, sorry, Mike McQueary slammed a locker door real loud to break up one rape.

I hope these victims and all the others out there who have not yet come forward, sue the shit out of Penn State and Jerry’s Estate. In addition if Dottie Sandusky is being as loyal to her husband as she is right now, you can bet she knew damn well that her husband was a child abuser but she protected him so she could keep her good name, her nice home, and all her nice things.

If they can prove she knew anything, I hope the victims sue her too.

“—Victim 1: Sandusky was accused of fondling him and performing oral sex on him multiple times, in his home and State College hotels. The boy was 11-15 years old at the time. Sandusky was barred from his central Pennsylvania high school in 2009 after the boy’s mother alerted school officials, triggering the investigation that produced charges. Sandusky was found guilty of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse (two counts), indecent assault, unlawful contact with minor, corruption of minors, endangering a child’s welfare.

—Victim 2: A boy of about 10 that a graduate assistant, Mike McQueary, has said he saw being attacked by Sandusky in the team showers in February 2001. Investigators have not been able to determine the boy’s identity. McQueary reported what he saw to head coach Joe Paterno, and Paterno’s handling of it contributed to the university’s decision to fire him shortly after Sandusky was arrested in November. Sandusky was found guilty of indecent assault, unlawful contact with minor, corruption of minors, endangering a child’s welfare. He was acquitted of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse.

—Victim 3: Sandusky was accused of hugging him in the shower and fondling him between July 1999 and December 2001, at Sandusky’s home and in team showers. The boy was 12-14. Sandusky was found guilty of indecent assault, unlawful contact with minor, corruption of minors, endangering a child’s welfare.

—Victim 4: Prosecutors said more than 50 incidents occurred between 1996 and 2000, at the Sandusky home, hotels and university facilities while the boy was 12-17. He also traveled with the Sandusky family to bowl games in Texas and Florida. Sandusky was convicted of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, indecent assault, unlawful contact with minor, corruption of minors, endangering a child’s welfare.

—Victim 5: Sandusky put his hand on the boy’s leg while in a car, they showered together and he placed the boy’s hand on his genitals, according to his testimony in court. The alleged incident occurred in August 2001, while the boy was 12 or 13. Sandusky was convicted of unlawful contact with minor, corruption of minors, endangering a child’s welfare. He was acquitted of indecent assault.

—Victim 6: While showering together in May 1998, he testified that Sandusky grabbed him and said, “I’m going to squeeze your guts out” and that the ex-coach said he was the “tickle monster.” The boy’s mother complained when he came home with wet hair, prompting a police investigation at the time that did not result in charges. The boy was 11. Sandusky was found guilty of unlawful contact with minor, corruption of minors, endangering a child’s welfare. He was acquitted of indecent assault,

—Victim 7: They showered together and Sandusky bear hugged him in 1995-96, and more than once he put his hands down the waistband of the boy’s pants, according to the grand jury. Sandusky did not touch his genitals, the jury said. The boy was 9-11. Sandusky was found guilty of attempted indecent assault, corruption of minors, endangering a child’s welfare.

—Victim 8: Boy of about 11 to 13, seen in late November 2000 by a university janitor allegedly being subjected to sexual abuse by Sandusky in the team showers. The janitor now has dementia and is not available to testify, but a co-worker testified to what the janitor told him. The boy has not been identified by investigators. Sandusky was convicted of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse, indecent assault, unlawful contact with minor, corruption of minors, endangering a child’s welfare.

—Victim 9: Now 18, he testified that he was sexually abused by Sandusky at the Sandusky home where he spent more than a hundred nights in a room in the basement that had a waterbed. He testified he was subject to oral then anal sex and screamed for help. He was also abused in a State College hotel and other locations between July 2005 and December 2008, according to prosecutors. He was 12-15 at the time. Sandusky was convicted of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse (two counts), indecent assault, unlawful contact with a minor, corruption of minors, endangering a child’s welfare.

—Victim 10: Boy was subjected to sexual abuse between September 1997 and July 1999 at the Sandusky home and car and at an area pool. He testified Sandusky said he’d never see his family again if he said anything. The boy was 11. Sandusky was convicted of involuntary deviate sexual intercourse (two counts), indecent assault, unlawful contact with minor, corruption of minors, endangering a child’s welfare.”

______________________________________________________________

washingtonpost

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Child Abuse, child molestation, child sexual abuse, evil and tagged , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Decades of Horror Perpetrated on Innocent Boys Could Have Been Prevented

  1. Patsy says:

    The first commenter may have a point about McQueary. I think he should be charged as well because he did not stop it, nor did he go to the police himself. A crime was being committed and he did nothing????!!! That may be because he too was a victim and was jealous of the “attention” Sandusky was “showering” on the little 10 year old boy. That is the only thing that makes sense because I cannot imagine coming up on a scene like what he described, making eye contact with that innocent little boy and not doing anything!!! He should be in jail too, he probably got immunity.

    • Alethea says:

      Patsy, you might be absolutely right on correct, and if Mike McQueary were a child, he would be innocent of any wrong doing in being jealous. But he was a grown man when he found the boy being sodomized. Once a person is a certain age, they have a moral DUTY and OBLIGATION to other victims.

  2. Nawila says:

    I find it difficult to understand his wife. Is she serious. Your man spending all this time with boys in his basement and you dont suspect anything? Wow. There is something wrong with her maybe she was a victim too?
    I also read a comment on face book concerning the trial the writer guessed the reason Mike McQueary did not report the crime immediately to the police was because he may have been one of Sandusky’s victims in the past McQuerys father probably threatened him (jerry Sandusky) to never touch his son or another chid and Mike seeing Jerry abuse another child he didnt know what to do. We must not forget not everyone who was abused by Jerry Sandusky will ever speak out. Some will keep their secrets forever.

    • Alethea says:

      Nawila,

      Good comment. There is a GREAT possibility that Mike McQueary was a victim of Jerry Sandusky’s and he did not know how to handle re-living the abuse. Very very possible. But he did eventually speak up and by doing so, he helped stop Jerry Sandusky. I know he should have done it at the time, but at least he finally spoke up.

  3. little nel says:

    I remember when one of my mother’s boyfriends decided to show me his picture albums of his models’ who posed for “portraits.”

    They were nude photos of young teens. He was trying to persuade me that this was what his young lovers enjoyed doing with him in private.

    I was 12 at the time. I remember feeling real uncomfortable because I was not expecting nude photos and he was so proud of those “artistic” photos that he took in his studio.

    It was then that he offered to let me pose for him in a private photo shoot but only if I did not tell anyone.

    He said that I could pose in my bathing suit and if I felt “comforable” with that then I could undress any time I wanted to for nude shots. “You know that your friends would jump at a chance like this because I’m so successful”

    • Alethea says:

      Sounds like what Polanski did with his victim before he raped her.

      • little nel says:

        I declined the offer, but he started a phone relationship/campaigne with me. He said that the only reason that he “dated” my mother was to be near me.

        Why my mother never caught on seemed odd. Maybe his wealth and high profile life caused her to ignore the obvious.

  4. little nel says:

    Hard to believe that Jerry did all those things and more for over 15 years and no one would arrest, charge or prosecute Jerry til now.
    This was a powerful man.

    I wonder if he’s sitting in jail crying because he couldn’t control the outcome of his trial. He is probably cursing his attorney and blaming everyone else for his guilty verdict.

    Will he ever feel compassion for his victims and sorry for his crimes?

Comments are closed.