An Open Letter to Wendy Murphy About Her Open Letter to Woody Allen

Wendy Murphy is a professor of sexual violence law at New England Law, Boston, and a former sex crimes prosecutor, but I have a problem with her letter to Woody Allen, published at: Womensnews, and at


Wednesday, February 5, 2014

By Wendy Murphy

“Dear Woody,

If you weren’t the umpteenth famous or wealthy guy accused of sexually abusing a child I’d write that I’m outraged and I’d condemn you for being a monster.

But you’re not unusual, sadly. And after decades in this business, I’m tired of being outraged.

Which is why I’m writing a different kind of letter to you, Woody. Most men accused of child sex abuse do exactly what you did. They deny the allegations and accuse the child of lying out of spite, or being mentally ill, or they say the child is an innocent victim of a vindictive mother who made the child lie.

In one of the statements from your representative, it’s said that the allegations of your adoptive daughter, Dylan Farrow, published again recently in an open letter, are false because a 7-year-old child cannot be trusted to distinguish between fantasy and reality. This claim makes you look particularly guilty, Woody. See, little girls fantasize about becoming princesses and doctors. They don’t “fantasize” about being told to lie face down and watch a toy train go by while being sexually abused from behind. They have no context to conjure up such a fantasy.

Claims that children fantasize about sexual abuse are usually the projected fantasies of guilty perpetrators. Truly innocent guys don’t come up with the fantasies excuse because it never crosses their minds to consider the possibility of any child fantasizing about sexual abuse.

The fantasy defense can be effective because it resonates with the public. Most people who never molest children have imagined themselves engaged in some kind of unusual sexual fantasy. They’re open to the possibility that an allegation of odd sexual behavior is a fantasy because it makes them feel “normal” about their own weird urges.

By accusing Dylan of fantasizing, Woody, you might succeed in persuading a few people that you did nothing wrong, but most will see such a defense as an admission of guilt. More importantly, you’ll never overcome your self-loathing and feelings about your own “weird” urges until you accept responsibility for your actions.

I know this is a long shot, but I’m hoping you might have the guts to stand out from the crowd and not only condemn the fantasy defense but also use your platform to help others. Think about it. You’ve made a huge mark as a filmmaker. Now’s your chance to really make history.

You don’t have to explain why you did what you did, and you don’t have to offer up any details. It’s enough to acknowledge the pain of one little girl.

I’m sure you once loved Dylan, Woody, and I know you understand love because so many of your films deal with its power.

In “Midnight in Paris,” you wrote dialogue for Ernest Hemingway that no doubt reveals something inside of you:

“All cowardice comes from loving, or not loving well, which is the same thing.”

Don’t be a coward, Woody. You’ve written extraordinary dialogue for some of film’s most interesting characters. Be brave enough now to write the most profound words of your storied career:

“I’m sorry.”

Alethea’s reply:

Dear Ms. Murphy,

Why on earth did you address him as “dear Woody?” This displays an affection for the man, or a personal connection to him in some way. Would you have written to Ariel Castro, “dear Ariel?” or to Jerry Sandusky, “dear Jerry?”

Maybe you don’t see it in yourself, but your letter is indicative of your being exactly like many people in the film and entertainment industry, and just like Woody Allen fans –people who place this man in a different category merely because of his so-called talent as a writer, actor, and director.

You mention”Midnight in Paris,” and you say Mr. Allen has written “extraordinary dialogue for some of film’s most interesting characters.”

If this were your Average Joe child molester off the street, would you have as much public or private admiration for that guy’s talent as an artist?

Ms. Murphy, in spite of your work against child abuse, you have fallen into the category of star-struck people who admire and talk about the good deeds and creative abilities of the sexual perpetrator –as if their “good” side somehow balances out their acts of child molestation, or somehow puts them into a ‘different kind of category from other molesters.’

Ms. Murphy, you must have worked with sexual abuse victims, and survivors, long enough to know that we have all heard this line of garbage from the apologists for our abusers who told us, “but he was a good provider.” “But she cleaned the church every Sunday.” “But he was a good priest.” “He was a great singer, loved animals, and gave to children’s charities.”  “He was a great football coach.”

Ms. Murphy, the victims don’t care.

Once an adult sexually violates a child, ipso-facto (Latin for “by the fact itself; by the very nature of the deed”)… his or her “talents” and “good works” fly out the window.

You write that Woody Allen once loved Dylan, and that he “understands love” because you say “so many of his films deal with its power.”


Just because someone writes scripts or a play, or directs a film about adult relationships, it does not mean that person has one ounce of understanding about what LOVE is.

LOVE does not sexually molest a child and tell her to keep quiet about it, and bribe the child with promises of being in a film.

You are correct about one thing Ms. Murphy, like Woody Allen, most men accused of child sexual abuse do indeed deny the allegations and accuse the child of lying and fantasizing.

LOVE does not do this to a child.

Woody Allen is no better, and no worse, than any other child sexual abuser. He is nothing special Ms. Murphy, and I would be shocked if he made history and apologized. Like most child sexual abusers, he will deny it to his grave, or blame Dylan, or blame Mia Farrow.

“I’m sorry” is rarely in the vocabulary of those who sexually molest and rape children.

The vast majority of child sexual abusers do not think they did anything wrong, or they believe the child wanted it.

Child sexual abuses are often sociopaths.

Any sociopath can write a screenplay, and any child sexual abuser can fantasize about adult relationships and turn it into a film.

Do NOT idolize this man publicly. You do a gross injustice to victims of child sexual abuse.





This entry was posted in Child Abuse, child molestation, child sexual abuse, Crime, News and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to An Open Letter to Wendy Murphy About Her Open Letter to Woody Allen

  1. Alethea says:

    I was mistaken earlier about Woody Allen and Mia Farrow being married. They were not, but were in a 12 year relationship and often behaved as if married.

    Nevertheless, 56 year-old Allen began a sexual affair with the 19 year-old adopted daughter of his longtime partner….the daughter Mia Farrow adopted when the child was seven or eight…and he began the affair while Mia was still his girlfriend.

    It is virtually incestuous, and indicative of a man with little control over himself.

    The relationship between Woody Allen and Soon-Yi is referred to as “stepdaughter” because she was legally Farrow’s daughter and Allen’s son’s sister. Farrow and Allen were together as a couple while Soon-Yi was still a very young child, and through her teens.

    • Jess says:

      Here is my speculation… He started molesting soon yi as soon as he got her, I believe it only came out as a so called affair when woody knew he no longer needed to hide it due to age. But I think he brainwashed that girl from childhood and is probably still severely brainwashed. Molestation to her seems “normal” and who knows the guilt and fear he instilled in her. I’d feel differently if she went with him as an adult who didn’t grow up with him. But that really changes the dynamic.

      • Alethea says:

        Jess, I also think he began to groom Soon-Yi and engage in sexual acts with her long before he was caught in the affair with her.

        • Little Nel says:

          I agree about the grooming and sexual acts with Soon-Yi long before it became known to Mia.

          I can’t help but think that Soon-Yi’s siblings knew about it also.

          I know that my step-sister and my father were lovers when she was 13. I know that he started grooming her as early as age 8 because he would come into the bathroom while we were bathing and ask us to dance for him while we were playing in the bath tub. He reinforced the idea that there was nothing wrong with our nude dancing while he watched.

          • Alethea says:

            LN, with all due respect to you (which I have plenty of because of your desire to look at yourself and heal), please don’t label them as “lovers.”

            It was a matter of perpetrator and his victim. Just because a 13 year-old is seemingly willingly enjoying being sexually abused by her step-father, it does not mean she would not have chosen a different path had she not been groomed and sexually abused throughout her formative years, and then as a young teen.

            Her soul did not want what he did to her. She cannot be guilty for liking what was forced on her and then conditioned in her mind to think was pleasurable.

            • Jess says:

              Agreed. I too really cringe at any words indicative of consent and willful knowledge of what one is doing. My father got me to do many things for him and all the while I thought it was daddy love, but never did I say to myself boy I’m attracted to him and so i want him. I wasn’t attracted, I just wanted love and attention and more importantly I trusted and believed every word he said without question or regard to my being. If something hurt but he said it was ok then my next thought was what’s wrong with me not what’s wrong with him.

  2. Little Nel says:

    “How can Soon-Yi not see…”

    Birds of a feather, flock together.

  3. I’m so glad you called her out on thisl. The letter is absolutely disgusting & this is an obvious attempt to seem clever. First off anyone who is appalled by this type of behavior doesn’t just throw their hands in the air one day and say “Oh same old same old… so let me see if I can reform this one because he’s special”. No way… such ignorance. If anything hate him LOUDER! He feels he is untouchable & his antics are a slap in the face to his victims and other victims everywhere. When I see pics of him holding his newer daughter’s hands or squeezing them as they give off an uncomfortable vibe I just want to scream! He may be famous but why is it just accepted as if it were one of his many “quirks”?

    Thank you for another very well written article on evil. If everyone would get over their own uncomfortable feelings and actually SEE abuse, it wouldn’t be as easy for it to “hide”.

  4. Little Nel says:

    Dylan Farrow has responded to Woody Allen’s written denial.

    “Once again, Woody Allen is attacking me and my family in an effort to discredit and silence me.”

    An ex-girlfriend, who said she was 17 when she “dated” Woody and engaged in a “romantic” relationship with him has come to his defense.

    She claimed that it was “consensual” and her mother approved. There was no mention of her father.

    Did Woody tell that 17 year old girl that she would be in one of his movies? Did she think that Woody was her ticket to stardom? Was this woman’s mother another “star struck” individual who craved Woody’s influence for her daughter’s success?

    The more that I hear about this man, the more deplorable he sounds.

  5. Kevin F says:

    Good stuff, Alethea. Spot on.

  6. Little Nel says:

    “He is nothing special, Ms. Murphy”

    True, True, True, Alethea.
    I don’t believe Woody thought that he did anything wrong to Dylan. He has his own set of rules that makes him “special’ in his own mind so he can indulge in his sadistic sexual behavior towards little girls and tell himself, “I’ve done nothing wrong.”

    Dylan didn’t consent to anything with Woody. He envisioned the “script” of her assault before he did the deed. He never considered her well being, just his “lust” for her. He’s a monster.

    • “Dylan didn’t consent to anything with Woody. He envisioned the “script” of her assault before he did the deed. He never considered her well being, just his “lust” for her. He’s a monster.”

      Amen… I’m sure you are exactly right. He is just so gross in every way possible. And how can Soon-Yi not see history repeating right now???

Comments are closed.